| To: | satya srikanth <satyasrikanth2001@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: gigabit ethernet |
| From: | "Xiaoliang (David) Wei" <weixl@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Feb 2004 01:34:32 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040212083915.73516.qmail@web21109.mail.yahoo.com> |
| References: | <20040212083915.73516.qmail@web21109.mail.yahoo.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 |
Hi Satya, Did you check the CPU utilization? If you use smaller packet size, the interrupt rate may be a problem. You can modulate the NIC's interrupt rate. See the document for details: http://www.intel.com/support/network/adapter/1000/e1000.htm#parameters Also, I assume the round trip propagation delay for your connections is very small (such as <10ms)?
satya srikanth wrote:
-- ------------------------------------------------------ Xiaoliang (David) Wei Graduate Student of CS@Caltech WWW: http://www.cs.caltech.edu/~weixl ====================================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Change proxy_arp to respond only for valid neighbours, Julian Anastasov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Update FarSync WAN driver in 2.4.25, Kevin Curtis |
| Previous by Thread: | gigabit ethernet, satya srikanth |
| Next by Thread: | Re: gigabit ethernet, satya srikanth |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |