netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates

from [Nivedita Singhvi] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates
From: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:50:18 -0800
Cc: sri@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040209124145.48de8d55.davem@redhat.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402061649001.10831@localhost.localdomain> <20040206194518.56787717.davem@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402091155070.10043@localhost.localdomain> <4027EECA.9000705@us.ibm.com> <20040209124145.48de8d55.davem@redhat.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 
David S. Miller wrote:

I understand.

But there was no known reason to tweak things for SCTP. 

Yeah, I agree it doesn't matter right now for SCTP.
I don't know of anyone running SCTP *and* heavy NFS/raw
apps simultaneously. But they open up those socket
buffers for some real decent SCTP performance and
watch that unconstrained raw or udp traffic bludgeon
any congestion controlled streams like TCP and SCTP
out of the network. But this is a rather intrinsic
problem with other solutions, really..

thanks,
Nivedita



[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [NFS] [PATCH][RFC] use completions instead of sleep_on forrpciod, trond . myklebust
Next by Date:  Re: [NFS] [PATCH][RFC] use completions instead of sleep_on forrpciod, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:  Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates, David S. Miller
Next by Thread:  [PATCH] af_unix: Fix path of /proc/net/unix, OGAWA Hirofumi
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]