| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | socket() returns "Invalid argument". Why? (part 2 :) ) |
| From: | Fernando Gont <fernando@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:18:27 -0300 |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi! While I was making some tests with the socket functions, I intentionally called socket() this way: socket(9999, SOCK_STREAM, 0) (with a protocol family not supported). I was expecting to get a EPFNOSUPPORT, but I got a EINVAL error code, instead. After posting a message to comp.protocol.tcp-ip, someone noted that the socket.h header of his Solaris system had a PF_MAX constant, and that it'd be possible that a EINVAL was returned for any protofol family number greater than PF_MAX. I checked my Linux header files, and found in bits/socket.h the following constants definitions: #define PF_UNSPEC 0 /* Unspecified. */ #define PF_LOCAL 1 /* Local to host (pipes and file-domain). */ #define PF_UNIX PF_LOCAL /* Old BSD name for PF_LOCAL. */ [....] #define PF_SNA 22 /* Linux SNA Project */ #define PF_IRDA 23 /* IRDA sockets. */ #define PF_MAX 32 /* For now.. */ and I got surprised that the PF_MAX constant was *not* defined to be 23 (ie., the highest defined protocol number). Why is PF_MAX defined like this? I changed my socket() call to: socket(25, SOCK_STREAM, 0) (with a protocol familiy lower than PF_MAX) suspecting that perhaps now I'd get a EPFNOSUPPORT. But I still got a EINVAL error code. So that I had a look at the socket.c source code, and found the following: int sock_create(int family, int type, int protocol, struct socket **res)
{
int i;
struct socket *sock;
/*
* Check protocol is in range
*/
if(family<0||family>=NPROTO)
return -EINVAL;#if defined(CONFIG_KMOD) && defined(CONFIG_NET)
/* Attempt to load a protocol module if the find failed.
*
* 12/09/1996 Marcin: But! this makes REALLY only sense, if the user
* requested real, full-featured networking support upon configuration.
* Otherwise module support will break!
*/
if (net_families[family]==NULL)
{
char module_name[30];
sprintf(module_name,"net-pf-%d",family);
request_module(module_name);
}
#endif
if (net_families[family]==NULL)
return -EINVAL;I don't understand why the code says: if(family<0||family>=NPROTO)
return -EINVAL;instead of:
if(family<0||family>=PF_MAX)
return -EPFNOSUPPORT;(Note that I check "family" against PF_MAX (instead of NPROTO), and that the return value is EPFNOSUPPORT (instead of EINVAL)) I mean: Why does the code use NPROTO instead of PF_MAX? What's the point of having PF_MAX (or NPROTO) defined to be a value greater than the highest defined protocol number? If the TCP/IP stack does not return a EPFNOSUPPORT errror code in this case (the call to socket I pointed out at the beginning of this message), when would it do it? TIA, Fernando Gont e-mail: fernando@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Fwd: Question about /usr/include/netdevice.h], Joe Golio |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | PPP over socket?, fabrizio . gennari |
| Previous by Thread: | [Fwd: Question about /usr/include/netdevice.h], Joe Golio |
| Next by Thread: | PPP over socket?, fabrizio . gennari |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |