netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Tigon3 5701 PCI-X recv performance problem

from [John Partridge] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Tigon3 5701 PCI-X recv performance problem
From: John Partridge <johnip@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:26:09 -0600
Cc: ak@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, jes@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20031111122403.2d7bcf28.davem@redhat.com>
References: <3F844578.40306@sgi.com> <20031008101046.376abc3b.davem@redhat.com> <3F8455BE.8080300@sgi.com> <20031008183742.GA24822@wotan.suse.de> <20031008122223.1ba5ac79.davem@redhat.com> <20031008202248.GA15611@oldwotan.suse.de> <3F8702FF.70500@sgi.com> <20031010192036.GA31727@wotan.suse.de> <3F8802E6.5030601@sgi.com> <20031011131921.GC21763@wotan.suse.de> <20031011105054.0e16a607.davem@redhat.com> <3F8C290A.3010508@sgi.com> <20031014095323.71c8b9fe.davem@redhat.com> <3FB03A56.7000709@sgi.com> <20031110182911.2c5a121b.davem@redhat.com> <3FB140E2.1070007@sgi.com> <20031111122403.2d7bcf28.davem@redhat.com>
Reply-to: johnip@xxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031022 Thunderbird/0.3
David S. Miller wrote: 
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:04:50 -0600
Why are you depending upon MCKINLEY?  Don't all ia64 cpus
give traps for unaligned memory accesses?


I have no evidence of a problem with Itanium1, only on Itanium2 (MCKINLEY)
I have seen it on HP and SGI MCKINLEY

--
John Partridge

Silicon Graphics Inc
Tel:  651-683-3428
Vnet: 233-3428
E-Mail: johnip@xxxxxxx


[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Fw: PROBLEM: Memory leak in -test9?, Andrew Morton
Next by Date:  Re: Tigon3 5701 PCI-X recv performance problem, John Partridge
Previous by Thread:  Re: Tigon3 5701 PCI-X recv performance problem, David S. Miller
Next by Thread:  Re: Tigon3 5701 PCI-X recv performance problem, Jeff Garzik
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]