netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0

from [Jeff Garzik] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 16:36:40 -0500
Cc: Pekka Pietikainen <pp@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20031104132017.1d43a69c.davem@redhat.com>
References: <1067888106.3366.20.camel@bluez.bueche.ch> <20031103205335.GA7668@ee.oulu.fi> <20031103151618.79704b30.davem@redhat.com> <20031104111555.GA26860@ee.oulu.fi> <20031104091355.70d6a3d1.davem@redhat.com> <20031104211937.GA3888@ee.oulu.fi> <20031104132017.1d43a69c.davem@redhat.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703
David S. Miller wrote: 
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 23:19:37 +0200
Pekka Pietikainen <pp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 09:13:55AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:

free_netdev() is being invoked before the device registration
state advanced to NETREG_UNREGISTERED, likely unregister_netdev()
has not been called first or a bogus pointer was passed into
the routine.

Ah, like a missing SET_NETDEV_DEV? :-)


Wonderful, Jeff please integrate this b44 patch from Pekka. 


If someone can send me the latest patch, certainly!  :)

There wasn't a patch appended to this message I'm replying to, nor did any of the patches I saw on netdev include a SET_NETDEV_DEV change...

        Jeff




[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Autoconfig link-local address on ip6-ip6 tunnel device, David S. Miller
Next by Date:  Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:  Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0, David S. Miller
Next by Thread:  Re: changing MTU on b44 breaks eth0, David S. Miller
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]