netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices

from [Roman Pletka] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Bas Bloemsaat <bloemsaa@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices
From: Roman Pletka <rap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 10:49:46 +0200
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, skraw@xxxxxxxxxx, willy@xxxxxxxxx, richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, carlosev@xxxxxxxxxxxx, lamont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davidsen@xxxxxxx, marcelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, layes@xxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <353568DCBAE06148B70767C1B1A93E625EAB58@post.pc.aspectgroup.co.uk><20030819145403.GA3407@alpha.home.local><20030819170751.2b92ba2e.skraw@ithnet.com><20030819085717.56046afd.davem@redhat.com><20030819185219.116fd259.skraw@ithnet.com><1061319864.30565.52.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20030819120131.1999b1ec.davem@redhat.com> <091f01c36686$dade2bf0$c801a8c0@llewella>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020903
Bas Bloemsaat wrote: 
Indeed, would people stop quoting from RFC 985 and
RFC 826.



RFC 826 is referenced from 1009 as describing ARP. So in effect it does
define a standard.


RFC 1009 is obsolete too (by 1812 for the sake of completeness).
Please stop quoting obsolete RFC's.

-- Roman


[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices, Bas Bloemsaat
Next by Date:  [PATCH] IPv6: Fix target address for (proxy/anycast) NA, Ville Nuorvala
Previous by Thread:  Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices, David S. Miller
Next by Thread:  Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices, Stephan von Krawczynski
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]