netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices

To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices
From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 20:21:00 -0700
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, Willy Tarreau <willy@xxxxxxxxx>, alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, carlosev@xxxxxxxxxxxx, lamont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bloemsaa@xxxxxxxxx, marcelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, layes@xxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1030818171100.2101C-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
Organization: Candela Technologies
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1030818171100.2101C-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030529
Bill Davidsen wrote:

Okay, I'll show my ignorance and ask... the Documentation for arp_filter
says source routing must be used. Is there some flag I'm missing, or a way
to avoid having a rule per address, or is the 8 bit rule number larger in
2.6, or ??? Or is having a lot of IPs on one machine not an imaginable
case?

Last response I got was that one would have to hack the netlink api to get a bigger index because the design (and rfc, unfortunately) describe the field as only 8 bits. I never did hear a response to my comment that this was inadequate in this age of vlans...

--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>