netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1

To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ???? <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: O/M flags against 2.6.0-test1
From: Krishna Kumar <krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:59:47 -0700
Cc: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030722.182545.97160275.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Organization: IBM
References: <200307210155.FAA31320@dub.inr.ac.ru> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307221415140.14683-100000@DYN318430.beaverton.ibm.com> <20030722.182545.97160275.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
I guess you are talking about the statistics part. This is fine with me.

thx,

- KK

YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ???? wrote:
In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307221415140.14683-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at 
Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:50:21 -0700 (PDT)), Krishna Kumar <krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx> says:


I didn't add the statistics, though it can be implemented :
RTA_PUT(skb, IFLA_INET6_STATS, sizeof(idev->stats.icmpv6),
                &idev->stats.icmpv6[0]);
RTA_PUT(skb, IFLA_INET6_STATS, sizeof(idev->stats.icmpv6),
               &idev->stats.icmpv6[1]);
something like that would work ?


I'd like to do this later, if you don't mind.

--yoshfuji



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>