netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on top of bo

from [Jeff Garzik] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: ralph+d@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on top of bonding
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:30:22 -0400
Cc: Dan Hollis <goemon@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.51.0307151434100.4590@ns.istop.com>
Organization: none
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307151115500.6012-100000@sasami.anime.net> <Pine.LNX.4.51.0307151434100.4590@ns.istop.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021213 Debian/1.2.1-2.bunk
Ralph Doncaster wrote: 
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Dan Hollis wrote:


That is exactly what it does. hw tcp checksumming helps a LOT at gbe rates 


This still doesn't make any sense.  The copy from user-space to kernel
space does the checksum as far as I recall (unless you use the
router-not-host kernel build option).



Not for the zero-copy case.

        Jeff




[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  2.6.0-test1: oops in raw_rcv_skb, Burton Windle
Next by Date:  [PATCH] dynamic net_device for serial eql balancer, Stephen Hemminger
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on top of bonding, Dan Hollis
Next by Thread:  Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on top of bonding, Ralph Doncaster
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]