netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked

To: YOSHIFUJI@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked
From: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 12:39:50 +0300
Cc: pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, mika.liljeberg@xxxxxxxxx, andre@xxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20030711.143926.599349332.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307111143470.26262-100000@netcore.fi> <20030711.180449.126456521.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
Who adds the subnet router anycast address, kernel itself? Since what? I don't see this in 2.5.

--Mika


YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ???? wrote:

In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307111143470.26262-100000@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Fri, 11 Jul 2003 
11:46:00 +0300 (EEST)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> says:



I don't like this
while I would be ok to have configuration option
not to support anycast.


With "not to support anycast" you probably meant "not to support
subnet-router anycast address [automatically, in the kernel, as now]" ? These are entirely different things.



I meant disabling anycast entirely.



(Note that if there's a user-level API for setting anycast addresses, one could kick the subnet-router anycast address out of the kernel too. Whether that's desirable is another thing.)



We have but we cannot; it is refcnt'ed.

--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>