| To: | Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch]: CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES fix for MIPv6 |
| From: | Henrik Petander <lpetande@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:25:18 +0300 |
| Cc: | Henrik Petander <lpetande@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, vnuorval@xxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, ajtuomin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jagana@xxxxxxxxxx, kumarkr@xxxxxxxxxx, usagi-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030609203659.089b241b.nakam@linux-ipv6.org> |
| References: | <20030606223057.41ac1c9d.nakam@linux-ipv6.org> <Pine.GSO.4.44.0306091140470.25126-100000@morphine.tml.hut.fi> <20030609203659.089b241b.nakam@linux-ipv6.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225 |
Masahide NAKAMURA wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003 12:06:35 +0300 (EEST) Henrik Petander <lpetande@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Then the policies for mipv6 would need to be specified at the same time as the ipsec policies. This is not a problem as long as the policies are loaded at start up. However, this could lead to problems with applications which specify their own policies, e.g. racoon. Henrik |
| Previous by Date: | Re: 3c59x (was Route cache performance under stress), Bogdan Costescu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 3c59x (was Route cache performance under stress), Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch]: CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES fix for MIPv6, Masahide NAKAMURA |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch]: CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES fix for MIPv6, Masahide NAKAMURA |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |