[PATCH] - Wrong use of RTM_BASE in XFRM message types.

[Krishna Kumar <krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I am using 2.5.68 and found XFRM_MSG_BASE being defined, but RTM_BASE used for
all XFRM messages, changed it. Current mailer (hopefully) shouldn't screw up
the tabs.

Thanks,

- KK

diff -ruN linux-2.5.68.org/include/linux/xfrm.h 
linux-2.5.68/include/linux/xfrm.h
--- linux-2.5.68.org/include/linux/xfrm.h       2003-05-23 11:02:27.000000000 
-0700
+++ linux-2.5.68/include/linux/xfrm.h   2003-05-23 11:04:02.000000000 -0700
@@ -104,17 +104,17 @@
 /* Netlink configuration messages.  */
 #define XFRM_MSG_BASE          0x10

-#define XFRM_MSG_NEWSA         (RTM_BASE + 0)
-#define XFRM_MSG_DELSA         (RTM_BASE + 1)
-#define XFRM_MSG_GETSA         (RTM_BASE + 2)
-
-#define XFRM_MSG_NEWPOLICY     (RTM_BASE + 3)
-#define XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY     (RTM_BASE + 4)
-#define XFRM_MSG_GETPOLICY     (RTM_BASE + 5)
-
-#define XFRM_MSG_ALLOCSPI      (RTM_BASE + 6)
-#define XFRM_MSG_ACQUIRE       (RTM_BASE + 7)
-#define XFRM_MSG_EXPIRE                (RTM_BASE + 8)
+#define XFRM_MSG_NEWSA         (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 0)
+#define XFRM_MSG_DELSA         (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 1)
+#define XFRM_MSG_GETSA         (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 2)
+
+#define XFRM_MSG_NEWPOLICY     (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 3)
+#define XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY     (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 4)
+#define XFRM_MSG_GETPOLICY     (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 5)
+
+#define XFRM_MSG_ALLOCSPI      (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 6)
+#define XFRM_MSG_ACQUIRE       (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 7)
+#define XFRM_MSG_EXPIRE                (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 8)

 #define XFRM_MSG_MAX           (XFRM_MSG_EXPIRE+1)