| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Zero copy transmit |
| From: | Steve Modica <modica@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:41:27 -0500 |
| In-reply-to: | <20030429192041.GC17413@Wotan.suse.de> |
| Organization: | SGI |
| References: | <3EAEC7FF.4040504@sgi.com> <20030429192041.GC17413@Wotan.suse.de> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030425 |
Andi Kleen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 01:44:15PM -0500, Steve Modica wrote:
We are aware of sendfile() and used it for the purposes of proving that zero copy would make a big difference for us. At issue is really application capture and customer adoption. There are tons of apps and lots of engineers that know socket operations and write/writev. Asking all ISVs to recode for linux would leave them with two separate APIs to deal with. They would have send/sendto or write/writev on Solaris, HPUX and whatever else, and linux would have sendfile. We really want to do this in such a way that it doesn't create a huge footprint (and we think we can) and we want to make sure we don't impact systems that can't take advantage of fast TLB updates. Steve
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Zero copy transmit, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Zero copy transmit, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Zero copy transmit, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Zero copy transmit, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |