| To: | Alan <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: cs89x0 in 2.5 (was Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size) |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:39:12 -0500 |
| Cc: | Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1043115448.13142.6.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> |
| References: | <20030117145357.GA1139@paradigm.rfc822.org> <20030117160840.GR12676@stingr.net> <20030117162818.GA1074@gtf.org> <20030117172719.GA31343@codemonkey.org.uk> <20030117174928.GA8304@gtf.org> <1043115448.13142.6.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021202 |
Alan wrote:
I've had no reports I remember about it breaking stuff, and several that it fixed stuff. It also seems to match the documentation. Its been in -ac for ages Andrew wrote: I've seen no reports either way, and appear to have misplaced the datasheet. Sounds good. Dave, whatever your preference for patching handling is, is all good. I guess yourself, myself, and akpm are all patch-mongering candidates... Jeff |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | non-growing tcp window size, Håkon Bugge |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Document, big |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: cs89x0 in 2.5 (was Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size), Alan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size, Ducrot Bruno |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |