netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFC][PATCH] net drivers and cache alignment

To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] net drivers and cache alignment
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 15:29:16 -0800
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <3DF2781D.3030209@pobox.com> <20021207.144004.45605764.davem@redhat.com> <3DF27EE7.4010508@pobox.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> David S. Miller wrote:
> > Can't the cacheline_aligned attribute be applied to individual
> > struct members?  I remember doing this for thread_struct on
> > sparc ages ago.
> 
> Looks like it from the 2.4 processor.h code.
> 
> Attached is cut #2.  Thanks for all the near-instant feedback so far :)
>   Andrew, does the attached still need padding on SMP?

It needs padding _only_ on SMP.  ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp.

#define offsetof(t, m)  ((int)(&((t *)0)->m))

struct foo {
        int a;
        int b __attribute__((__aligned__(1024)));
        int c;
} foo;

main()
{
        printf("%d\n", sizeof(struct foo));
        printf("%d\n", offsetof(struct foo, a));
        printf("%d\n", offsetof(struct foo, b));
        printf("%d\n", offsetof(struct foo, c));
}

./a.out
2048
0
1024
1028

So your patch will do what you want it to do.  You should just tag the
first member of a group with ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp, and keep an
eye on things with offsetof().

Not sure why sizeof() returned 2048 though.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>