netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Patch resubmission: RFC2863 operstatus for 2.5.50

from [Jeff Garzik] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Stefan Rompf <srompf@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Patch resubmission: RFC2863 operstatus for 2.5.50
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 13:15:26 -0500
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3DEDCE9A.61FDEBBC@isg.de>
References: <3DE33D6D.25B9C9B4@isg.de> <20021126.021546.91313706.davem@redhat.com> <3DED2EA9.D812C881@isg.de> <3DED51E9.1080408@pobox.com> <3DEDCE9A.61FDEBBC@isg.de>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021202
Stefan Rompf wrote:
Your second patch I am less enthusiastic about than the first... :( 


Well, with your opinion I count two against two: I want it, Jamal has
proposed the semantics, and Alexey doesn't want to waste a single bit of
a netlink message for this.


Well, for generic net stack issues, I weight Jamal and Alexey's opinion more than my own ;-)


[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Patch resubmission: RFC2863 operstatus for 2.5.50, Jeff Garzik
Next by Date:  Re: Patch resubmission: RFC2863 operstatus for 2.5.50, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:  Re: Patch resubmission: RFC2863 operstatus for 2.5.50, Stefan Rompf
Next by Thread:  Re: Patch resubmission: RFC2863 operstatus for 2.5.50, jamal
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]