| To: | "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) |
| From: | Dave Hansen <haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:42:38 -0700 |
| Cc: | "'Ben Greear'" <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <288F9BF66CD9D5118DF400508B68C44604758B78@orsmsx113.jf.intel.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE5.5; Windows 98; |
Feldman, Scott wrote:
Here is the lspci information, both -x and -vv. This is with two of the e1000 single-port NICS side-by-side. I have also strapped a P-IV CPU fan on top of the two cards to blow some air over them....running tests now to see if that actually helps anything. If it does, I'll be sure to send you a picture :) I get some strange e1000 failures too. It usually involves the watchdog kicking them back into order, but sometimes they'll stay offline for a while. Heat would explain it, though, because it only happens when I'm actually using the cards for a benchmark. I figured that it was either my cables, or a shoddy switch. The new dual-port e1000 that I have doesn't seem to have this problem, even though I'm running 4 times more traffic than the singles that I had. -- Dave Hansen haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Signal interrupt with connect., Geoffrey Lee |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!), Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!), Jonathan Lundell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!), Ben Greear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |