Re: PATCH Re: udp weirdness

[Chris Friesen <cfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ben Greear wrote:

> I cannot see any logical reason that we cannot ensure that a packet is
> not at least given to the driver when accepted by sendto.  As soon as I
> get my pktgen and send-to-self code cleaned up, I am planning to start
> working on making UDP reliably send packets, or return an error to
> the calling code.  I will, of course, keep you informed if I actually
> get something working...


That would be fantastic.

Chris