netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: PATCH Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high C

from [Jeff Garzik] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 21:03:48 -0400
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxx>, "Cureington, Tony" <tony.cureington@xxxxxx>, Pascal Brisset <pascal.brisset-ml@xxxxxxxxxx>, bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Organization: MandrakeSoft
References: <OF516AEB0B.459BB3DC-ON88256C39.0004B863@boulder.ibm.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
Jay Vosburgh wrote: 

      No, it doesn't.  This is a mere band aid until somebody can get time
to do it right.  It's "less bad."



Oh, well, in that case, patch approved :)

I'll apply it, unless you prefer to send it through DaveM or somebody else.

        Jeff




[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: PATCH Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Jay Vosburgh
Next by Date:  Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, Alexey Kuznetsov
Previous by Thread:  Re: PATCH Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: Bonding driver unreliable under high CPUload, Jay Vosburgh
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] 2.4.20-pre sundance.c cleanups, Richard Gooch
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]