| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads |
| From: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 17 Sep 2002 19:16:25 -0700 |
| Cc: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <Pine.GSO.4.30.0209172053360.3686-100000@shell.cyberus.ca> <20020917.180014.07882539.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
> From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 20:57:58 -0400 (EDT)
>
> I am not so sure with that 6% difference there is no other bug lurking
> there; 6% seems too large for an extra two PCI transactions per packet.
>
> {in,out}{b,w,l}() operations have a fixed timing, therefore his
> results doesn't sound that far off.
>
> It is also one of the reasons I suspect Andrew saw such bad results
> with 3c59x, but probably that is not the only reason.
They weren't "very bad", iirc. Maybe a 5% increase in CPU load.
It was all a long time ago. Will retest if someone sends URLs.
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, Martin Pool |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Info: NAPI performance at "low" loads, Eric W. Biederman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |