netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000

To: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 18:55:35 +0200
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <3D78F55C.4020207@colorfullife.com> <20020906.113829.65591342.davem@redhat.com> <3D790499.8020501@colorfullife.com> <20020906.123428.28085660.davem@redhat.com> <15741.57164.402952.136812@robur.slu.se>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 4.0)
Robert Olsson wrote:
>
> Anyway. A tulip NAPI variant added mitigation when we reached "some
> load" to  avoid the static interrupt delay. (Still keeping things
> pretty simple):
>
> Load   "Mode"
> -------------------
> Lo  1) RxIntDelay=0
> Mid 2) RxIntDelay=fix (When we had X pkts on the RX ring)
> Hi  3) Consecutive polling. No RX interrupts.
>
Sounds good.

The difficult part is when to go from Lo to Mid. Unfortunately my tulip card is braindead (LC82C168), but I'll try to find something usable for benchmarking

In my tests with the winbond card, I've switched at a fixed packet rate:

< 2000 packets/sec: no delay
> 2000 packets/sec: poll rx at 0.5 ms



--
        Manfred


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>