| To: | "Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000 |
| From: | Dave Hansen <haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 06 Sep 2002 10:36:37 -0700 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, tcw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3D78C9BD.5080905@us.ibm.com> <53430559.1031304588@[10.10.2.3]> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020822 |
Martin J. Bligh wrote:
Something strange happens to the clients when NAPI is enabled on the Specweb clients. Somehow the start using a lot more CPU. The increased idle time on the server is because the _clients_ are CPU maxed. I have some preliminary oprofile data for the clients, but it appears that this is another case of Specweb code just really sucking. Me too :) All that was changed was adding the new e1000 driver. NAPI was disabled. > You need to have a lot more data before leaping to the conclusion that it's because the specweb client code is crap.
oprofile summary:op_time -d 1 0.0000 0.0000 /bin/sleep 2 0.0001 0.0000 /lib/ld-2.2.5.so.dpkg-new (deleted) 2 0.0001 0.0000 /lib/libpthread-0.9.so 2 0.0001 0.0000 /usr/bin/expr 3 0.0001 0.0000 /sbin/init 4 0.0001 0.0000 /lib/libproc.so.2.0.7 12 0.0004 0.0000 /lib/libc-2.2.5.so.dpkg-new (deleted) 17 0.0005 0.0000 /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.6.dpkg-new (deleted) 20 0.0006 0.0000 /bin/bash 30 0.0010 0.0000 /usr/sbin/sshd 151 0.0048 0.0000 /usr/bin/vmstat 169 0.0054 0.0000 /lib/ld-2.2.5.so 300 0.0095 0.0000 /lib/modules/2.4.18+O1/oprofile/oprofile.o 1115 0.0354 0.0000 /usr/local/bin/oprofiled 3738 0.1186 0.0000 /lib/libnss_files-2.2.5.so 58181 1.8458 0.0000 /lib/modules/2.4.18+O1/kernel/drivers/net/acenic.o 249186 7.9056 0.0000 /home/dave/specweb99/build/client 582281 18.4733 0.0000 /lib/libc-2.2.5.so 2256792 71.5986 0.0000 /usr/src/linux/vmlinux top of oprofile from the client:
08051b3c 2260 0.948938 check_for_timeliness
08051cfc 2716 1.14041 ascii_cat
08050f24 4547 1.90921 HTTPGetReply
0804f138 4682 1.9659 workload_op
08050890 6111 2.56591 HTTPDoConnect
08049a30 7330 3.07775 SHMmalloc
08052244 7433 3.121 HTParse
08052628 8482 3.56146 HTSACopy
08051d88 10288 4.31977 get_some_line
08052150 13070 5.48788 scan
08051a10 65314 27.4243 assign_port_number
0804bd30 83789 35.1817 LOG
#define LOG(x) do {} while(0)
Voila! 35% more CPU!Top of Kernel profile: c022c850 33085 1.46602 number c0106e59 42693 1.89176 restore_all c01dfe68 42787 1.89592 sys_socketcall c01df39c 54185 2.40097 sys_bind c01de698 62740 2.78005 sockfd_lookup c01372c8 97886 4.3374 fput c022c110 125306 5.55239 __generic_copy_to_user c01373b0 181922 8.06109 fget c020958c 199054 8.82022 tcp_v4_get_port c0106e10 199934 8.85921 system_call c022c158 214014 9.48311 __generic_copy_from_user c0216ecc 257768 11.4219 inet_bind "oprofpp -k -dl -i /lib/libc-2.2.5.so" just gives: vma samples %-age symbol name linenr info image name 00000000 582281 100 (no symbol) (no location information) /lib/libc-2.2.5.so I've never really tried to profile anything but the kernel before. Any ideas? Troy - I think your UP clients weren't anywhere near maxed out on CPU power, right? Can you take a peek at the clients under NAPI load?
"vmstat 2" after the client has told the master that it is running: U S I ---------- 4 15 81 5 17 79 7 16 77 7 17 76 7 21 72 11 25 64 3 16 82 2 14 84 7 23 70 16 50 34 24 75 0 27 73 0 28 72 0 24 76 0 ... Dave - did you ever try running 4 specweb clients bound to each of No, but I'm not sure it will do any good. They don't run often enough and I have the feeling that there are very few cache locality benefits to be had. -- Dave Hansen haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Gerrit Huizenga |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Martin J. Bligh |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |