netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

kfree_skb: unnecessary check ?

To: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: kfree_skb: unnecessary check ?
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 18:53:18 +0200
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020412 Debian/0.9.9-6
Hi everyone.

In skbuff.h one sees:

static inline void kfree_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
if (atomic_read(&skb->users) == 1 || atomic_dec_and_test(&skb->users))
__kfree_skb(skb);
}


Is atomic_dec_and_test really necessary ? atomic_dec_and_test only returns true if its argument has hit zero, so it was 1 before.
If atomic_dec is only a bit cheaper than atomic_dec_and_test (which i guess it is), wouldn't it make more sense to use something like this:


static inline void kfree_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
   if (atomic_read(&skb->users) == 1)
       __kfree(skb);
   else
       atomic_dec(&skb->users);
}

Bye,
Patrick



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>