| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets |
| From: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 07 Jun 2002 15:15:24 -0700 |
| Cc: | cfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | Candela Technologies |
| References: | <3CFFB9F8.54455B6E@nortelnetworks.com> <20020606.202108.52904668.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 |
Datagram sockets are the ones that drop data though (tcp will deal with it via re-transmits). I have not looked at his patch in detail, but I would welcome anything that gets us closer to being able to account for every packet that enters the NIC, or enters the kernel from user-space via send(to), etc... David S. Miller wrote: Your idea is totally useless for non-datagram sockets. Only datagram sockets use the interfaces where you bump the counters. -- Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com> President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear |
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets, Chris Friesen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets, Mark Mielke |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets, Chris Friesen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets, Mark Mielke |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |