| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Patch: Device operative state notification against 2.5.7 |
| From: | Stefan Rompf <srompf@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 09 Apr 2002 13:28:37 +0200 |
| Cc: | Michael Richardson <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <Pine.GSO.4.30.0204072343250.12041-100000@shell.cyberus.ca> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi Jamal, > [discussion whether IFOP_DOWN_LOWERLAYER should send netlink messages] > > I think they should be accessible; whether you send netlink > advertisements everytime there is some state transition is the question. they should. For a routing daemon it is interesting to be notified when interfaces becomes capable or incapable of handling packets, independant of the reason. As long as we abstract virtual or subinterfaces as normal interfaces to the upper layers (which is IMHO the correct decision), IFOP_DOWN_LOWERLAYER must trigger a notification. Stefan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | QoS _put, _get and _delete class ops semantic, Martin Devera |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | remove unused kernel_stat fields, Randy.Dunlap |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: QoS _put, _get and _delete class ops semantic, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Patch: Device operative state notification against 2.5.7, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |