| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: raw sockets, IP_HDRINCL, and fragmentation |
| From: | Chris Friesen <cfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 07 Mar 2002 15:56:19 -0500 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <3C87AD05.F9BC8457@nortelnetworks.com> <20020307191645.A27213@oldwotan.suse.de> <3C87B887.3757786F@nortelnetworks.com> <20020307201818.A8893@wotan.suse.de> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 01:59:19PM -0500, Chris Friesen wrote: > > "When the IP_HDRINCL option is set datagrams will not be fragmented and are > > limited to the interface MTU. This is a limitation in Linux 2.2." > > > > Does 2.4 have this same limitation? > > It has. Is this a technical difficulty, or just an API issue? ie, how hard would it be to hack it to add fragmentation? I'm guessing I should be looking at ip_output.c, somewhere in the vicinity of ip_build_xmit()? Thanks, Chris -- Chris Friesen | MailStop: 043/33/F10 Nortel Networks | work: (613) 765-0557 3500 Carling Avenue | fax: (613) 765-2986 Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada | email: cfriesen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [BK PATCHES] lotsa net driver merges, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: raw sockets, IP_HDRINCL, and fragmentation, Petr Vandrovec |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: raw sockets, IP_HDRINCL, and fragmentation, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: raw sockets, IP_HDRINCL, and fragmentation, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |