| To: | Bogdan Costescu <bogdan.costescu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems (forrealthis |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 04 Jun 2001 14:43:12 -0400 |
| Cc: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Organization: | MandrakeSoft |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106031401050.31050-100000@kenzo.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Bogdan Costescu wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, jamal wrote:
>
> > Still, the tx watchdogs are a good source of fault detection in the case
> > of non-availabilty of MII detection and even with the presence of MII.
>
> Agreed. But my question was a bit different: is there any legit situation
> where Tx timeouts can happen in a row _without_ having a link loss ? In
> this situation, we'd have false positives...
yes
--
Jeff Garzik | Echelon words of the day, from The Register:
Building 1024 | FRU Lebed HALO Spetznaz Al Amn al-Askari Glock 26
MandrakeSoft | Steak Knife Kill the President anarchy echelon
| nuclear assassinate Roswell Waco World Trade Center
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: multicast hash incorrect on big endian archs, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems (forrealthis, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems (forrealthis, Bogdan Costescu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] support for Cobalt Networks (x86 only) systems (forrealthis, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |