netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Leaked net-device reference in eql.c

To: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Leaked net-device reference in eql.c
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 06:37:17 -0300
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, "netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lP9V7IeAmE3MgqNimUGZSQ/q3AWBVwJ922TelQZeX5kbfy//wnfJwzAirSV263rOQYz94z3a8yRl6+sdQjPrXFlQ6EsZ+DU4l5QCo46cZcXR33+E2jVo+YMO2YIg5K31RJm8BtCkMdEj10JnwgBjPK1Hbk4z/3FP7p76pPVsW9c=
In-reply-to: <43100709.1090800@candelatech.com>
References: <430FAF0D.5050000@candelatech.com> <430FE01E.9020600@trash.net> <43100709.1090800@candelatech.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On 8/27/05, Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > Ben Greear wrote:
> >
> >> I think the eql_s_slave_cfg method in eql.c leaks
> >> the reference to slave_dev.  Am I missing something?
> >
> >
> > No, it should also put the device, as in eql_g_slave_cfg.
> 
> Ok, I'm making a patch...will add this to it.
> 
> How about this one.  It seems like it does a dev_put when it shouldn't
> (if some of the if's fail, the dev_get never happened):
> 
> net/sched/sch_generic.c
> 
> static void dev_watchdog(unsigned long arg)
> {
>         struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *)arg;
> 
>         spin_lock(&dev->xmit_lock);
>         if (dev->qdisc != &noop_qdisc) {
>                 if (netif_device_present(dev) &&
>                     netif_running(dev) &&
>                     netif_carrier_ok(dev)) {
>                         if (netif_queue_stopped(dev) &&
>                             (jiffies - dev->trans_start) > 
> dev->watchdog_timeo) {
>                                 printk(KERN_INFO "NETDEV WATCHDOG: %s: 
> transmit timed out\n", dev->name);
>                                 dev->tx_timeout(dev);
>                         }
>                         if (!mod_timer(&dev->watchdog_timer, jiffies + 
> dev->watchdog_timeo))
>                                 dev_hold(dev);
>                 }
>         }
>         spin_unlock(&dev->xmit_lock);
> 
>         dev_put(dev);
> }

Doesn't look like its a problem, its the classical case where when you
associate some data structure to a timer you grab a refcount, when the
timer expires you drop the refcount, and as the code above shows when
mod_timer is succesfully called it grabs a reference, so the reference
being dropped above is from the previous timer firing, now its just a matter
if looking for the first mod_timer, that must be at some other place in
sched_generic.c, lemme see...


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>