netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: PATCH 2.4.0.9.2: export ethtool interface

To: Richard Gooch <rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: PATCH 2.4.0.9.2: export ethtool interface
From: Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 22:34:07 +1100
Cc: "howling@xxxxxxxx" <havanna_moon@xxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <39C883CF.9FB262FC@uow.edu.au>, <39C5D263.8DA31C03@mandrakesoft.com> <39C75CB6.E86C55F@uow.edu.au> <008101c02276$fe4fc5a0$1cac243e@dustin> <39C883CF.9FB262FC@uow.edu.au> <200009201612.e8KGC6x14517@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Richard Gooch wrote:
> 
> Andrew Morton writes:
> > But if someone is setting up a multi-node HA system or a router,
> > it's not unreasonable to expect them to fork out the $$$ for a NIC
> > which generates link status change interrupts, and to be prepared to
> > use twisted pair.
> 
> Such as the 3c59x?

Yep. 3c905B. 905C and most of the Cardbus NICs.

I don't know how useful the whole link-state-change-interrupt thing is
in practice.  The HA guys would, I suspect, say "thanks very much" and
continue to use application-level heartbeating, as they should.

We (I) need to ask them, and verify that there is actually a use for
this interface before running away and coding stuff.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>