Re: 802.1q Was (Re: Plans for 2.5 / 2.6 ???

[Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jes Sorensen wrote:
> 
> >>>>> "Ben" == Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> Ben> So just because you don't see a use for it means everyone else
> Ben> should be denied the use of it???  Gleb's argument is valid
> Ben> whether or not IPX exists, because other, so-far-unthought-of,
> Ben> protocols may be created, and they would have the same problem
> Ben> that IPX would now.
> 
> Try to take a look at how IPX behaves on the wire before commenting -
> the people who designed it need serious larting.
> 

May be somebody wants to put IPX on separate VLAN because IPX behaves
this way and you don't want to give him such possibility ? :)

Seriously, I don't see how your last argument is relevant to the
discussion.

--
                        Gleb.