netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [timers] net/ipv4

To: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [timers] net/ipv4
From: Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2000 01:07:23 +1000
References: <3933B0B2.50AB5EA1@uow.edu.au> from "Andrew Morton" at May 30, 0 10:14:42 pm <200005301659.UAA12445@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
Sender: owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
I've revisited net/ipv4/* and I agree it's safe.

kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> >   OK as long as always called from BH context.
> 
> Forget about this argument.

I was assuming that the network rx path was called from bh_action() and
hence that timers are serialised wrt network rx, But not process
context.

I see now that network rx is a softirq and is async wrt timers, which
makes things tougher.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>