| To: | Artur Skawina <skawina@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Hardware IP checksums |
| From: | Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Apr 2000 12:22:12 +1000 |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <200004241544.TAA08437@ms2.inr.ac.ru> <39048082.3EE153BF@geocities.com> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Artur Skawina wrote: > > > It appeared pretty useless. Jes noticed this first time, > > I had to check this experimentally, and yes... No visible improvements. > > HW checksum on transmit looks really not useful without zero copy. > > for example on p2 the extra checksumming cost (vs a plain copy) is ~7%, > and that's the worst case, ie everything cached. Add cache misses and > the difference won't be visible... Ah. That's pretty convincing. But it would be a huge win for zero-copy Tx, as Alexey points out. I need to pay a bit more attention to what's happening on that front. Thanks. -- -akpm- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Move shaper control information into skb->cb, Werner Almesberger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Move shaper control information into skb->cb, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Hardware IP checksums, Artur Skawina |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Hardware IP checksums, Artur Skawina |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |