> If some low-value stuff leaks through then ho-hum, at least it was
> on-topic. It is not as if we are unused to low-value content...
;-)
> It would be good if pure administrata such as changing the status were
> filtered.
That should be easy enough.
> In fact, there is probably no point in sending anything bugzilla->list apart
> from the initial report. If the bug is then pursued via bugzilla then OK.
> If is is pursued via email then bugzilla just captures the discussion.
OK, but I'm pretty much doing that already. I try to filter out some of
the "bugs with no content". So it sounds like the issue is more the
loop from email back in. Will see what I can get done - have to schedule
some time from the admins.
>> 2. email back in.
>>
>> Email back in is harder, and needs more thought as to how to make it
>> easy to use, whilst avoiding logging crap (eg. ensuing flamewars that
>> derive from the bug reports, etc).
>
> Well hopefully people will have the sense to cut the bugzilla address off
> the Cc line if it drifts off-topic.
Fairy nuff.
>> My intuition is to log replies by
>> default, and hack off certain threads by hand
>
> Nah. Just log everything and hack off the crap by larting people.
Heh. need to get a good "remote slap protocol" implemented. Perhaps
the net guys can write us an RFC for it ;-)
M.
|