| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | IPsec 2.5.70-bk9 and FreeS/WAN 1.99 with algopatches 0.8.1rc2 (in)compatible encryption methods |
| From: | "Dr. Peter Bieringer" <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 05 Jun 2003 15:07:36 +0200 |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi again, because I got no success, I've tried different encryption methods than 3DES. And *suddenly* it began to work. One side : 2.5.70-bk9 Other side: FreeS/WAN 1.99 with algopatches 0.8.1rc2 Result: AES --- AES-128: working AES-192: not working AES-256: not working FreeS/WAN: 112 "freeswan-racoon-tunnel" #14: STATE_QUICK_I1: initiate 003 "freeswan-racoon-tunnel" #14: ESP transform ESP_AES passed key_len=32 > 16 032 "freeswan-racoon-tunnel" #14: STATE_QUICK_I1: internal error
Other key lengths: not working NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
I'm very wondering why 3DES is incompatible in IPsec-SA modus, while working in IKE. Can someone confirm and/or extend this compatibility test? TIA,
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Bieringer http://www.bieringer.de/pb/
GPG/PGP Key 0x958F422D mailto: pb at bieringer dot de
Deep Space 6 Co-Founder and Core Member http://www.deepspace6.net/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch]: ipv6 tunnel for MIPv6, Ville Nuorvala |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPsec 2.5.70-bk9 and FreeS/WAN 1.99 with algopatches 0.8.1rc2 (in)compatible encryption methods, James Morris |
| Previous by Thread: | Bug in ipv6 ipsec in handling of packets with extension headers, Henrik Petander |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPsec 2.5.70-bk9 and FreeS/WAN 1.99 with algopatches 0.8.1rc2 (in)compatible encryption methods, James Morris |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |