| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | kernel scalability |
| From: | Anil Gunturu <anil.gunturu@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Nov 2004 23:17:01 -0800 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FbHlEe3ti7Hj34Y17GMom9+W69UGfQ6FbXkJaoArsu7hpt5rSABbhBZUyL3MZ0kxDA0GaK8GhZkpNrmDmgFZKWXm6+B/VaAQa0mUIQv/nR+dHdC4gBB/kN6BUow8ZPt/ae7XeBt8mL7i15P3yfBCwFygziOBQnFeAl+7bzzKlmI= |
| Reply-to: | Anil Gunturu <anil.gunturu@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi, We are porting linux kernel (2.4.18) for an embdded device that supports a large number of logical interfaces (upto 200) and routes (4000). There are only two physical ethernet interfaces, but we are planning to add multiple ip addresses and routes using the "ip" utility from iproute2 package. Just wondering if there are any scalability issues in doing so as far as the kernel is concerned. Thanks for your help, -Anil |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 2.6]: Fix device leaks in mirred action, Patrick McHardy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [NET] Get rid of unused glbl counter in neighbour, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 2.6]: Fix device leaks in mirred action, Patrick McHardy |
| Next by Thread: | [NET] Get rid of unused glbl counter in neighbour, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |