| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CHECKER] 120 potential dereference to invalid pointers errors forlinux 2.4.1 |
| From: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 18 Mar 2001 23:16:16 +1100 |
| Cc: | Junfeng Yang <yjf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Morton <andrewm@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Sun, 18 Mar 2001 06:29:50 CDT." <3AB49C2E.4792071B@mandrakesoft.com> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001 06:29:50 -0500,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Junfeng Yang wrote:
>> Start --->
>> busy = kmalloc(sizeof(erase_busy_t), GFP_KERNEL);
>> Error --->
>
>This sizeof() construct may be a special case for your checker, but it's
>a common one for the kernel... It definitely doesn't de-reference a
>pointer.
IMHO the above line is a bad construct. If the type of the variable
changes it is extremely easy to miss the fact that *alloc is now
returning the wrong size. I always do
busy = kmalloc(sizeof(*busy), GFP_KERNEL);
and let the compiler insert the correct type.
For the checker, you can also have typeof(). kdb has this line
typeof (*ef) local_ef;
The type definition of ef is kdb_eframe_t which is "pointer to some
arch dependent type" and local_ef is in arch independent code, much
easier to do this than use multiple #ifdef. Of course it would have
been even easier if kdb had separate types for the struct and the
pointer to the struct, then I would not need typeof(). OTOH I am sure
that somebody will find a use for typeof().
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CHECKER] 120 potential dereference to invalid pointers errors forlinux 2.4.1, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CHECKER] 120 potential dereference to invalid pointers errors forlinux 2.4.1, Andreas Dilger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CHECKER] 120 potential dereference to invalid pointers errors forlinux 2.4.1, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CHECKER] 120 potential dereference to invalid pointers errors forlinux 2.4.1, Andreas Dilger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |