| To: | Daniele Orlandi <daniele@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Request for an ARPHRD_ |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Oct 2005 00:24:55 +0200 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200510242333.05366.daniele@orlandi.com> |
| References: | <200510240255.28416.daniele@orlandi.com> <200510241807.23290.ak@suse.de> <200510242333.05366.daniele@orlandi.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.8.2 |
On Monday 24 October 2005 23:33, Daniele Orlandi wrote: > > > Normally Linux doesn't pre-allocate ABIs for out of tree code, mostly > > because it is not guaranteed that the interface won't change there. > > Could you clarify? What interface do you fear that could change? Any interface implemented by your out of tree code for which you're requesting to reserve constants. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Request for an ARPHRD_, Lennert Buytenhek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Request for an ARPHRD_, Daniele Orlandi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Request for an ARPHRD_, Daniele Orlandi |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH/RFC] Remove spurious sk_filter() call from IPv6, James Morris |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |