netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch] fix suspend/resume on b44

To: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [patch] fix suspend/resume on b44
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:26:35 -0700
Cc: jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050920132811.GA4563@elf.ucw.cz>
References: <20050920132811.GA4563@elf.ucw.cz>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Fix suspend/resume on b44 by freeing/reacquiring irq. Otherwise it
> hangs on resume.
> 
> ...
> diff --git a/drivers/net/b44.c b/drivers/net/b44.c
> --- a/drivers/net/b44.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/b44.c
> @@ -1930,6 +1930,8 @@ static int b44_suspend(struct pci_dev *p
>       b44_free_rings(bp);
>  
>       spin_unlock_irq(&bp->lock);
> +
> +     free_irq(dev->irq, dev);
>       pci_disable_device(pdev);
>       return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1946,6 +1948,9 @@ static int b44_resume(struct pci_dev *pd
>       if (!netif_running(dev))
>               return 0;
>  
> +     if (request_irq(dev->irq, b44_interrupt, SA_SHIRQ, dev->name, dev))
> +             printk(KERN_ERR PFX "%s: request_irq failed\n", dev->name);
> +
>       spin_lock_irq(&bp->lock);
>  
>       b44_init_rings(bp);
> 

Why does it hang on suspend/resume?

This came up a while back and iirc we decided that adding free_irq() to
every ->suspend() handler in the world was the wrong thing to do.  Do I
misremember?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>