| To: | john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 3/8] netpoll: e1000 netpoll tweak |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:10:38 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxx, jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxx, john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <56a8daef0508121202172bcd17@mail.gmail.com> |
| References: | <3.502409567@selenic.com> <4.502409567@selenic.com> <56a8daef0508121202172bcd17@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: John Ronciak <john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] netpoll: e1000 netpoll tweak Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:02:03 -0700 > Sorry this reply was to go to the whole list but only made it to Matt. > > The e1000_intr() routine already calls e1000_clean_tx_irq(). So > what's the point of this patch? Am I missing something? e1000_intr() does not call e1000_clean_tx_irq() when NAPI is enabled. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/8] netpoll: e1000 netpoll tweak, John Ronciak |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/8] netpoll: e1000 netpoll tweak, Matt Mackall |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 3/8] netpoll: e1000 netpoll tweak, John Ronciak |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 3/8] netpoll: e1000 netpoll tweak, Matt Mackall |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |