| To: | Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Infrahip] Re: [hipl-users] Re: [PATCH 2.6.12.2] XFRM: BEET IPsec mode for Linux |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:48:59 +1000 |
| Cc: | diego.beltrami@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, infrahip@xxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <B9CA81E3-5A80-4629-8D32-42A8C37142E2@nomadiclab.com> |
| References: | <E1Dy6gb-00044G-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> <1122651216.25842.67.camel@odysse> <B9CA81E3-5A80-4629-8D32-42A8C37142E2@nomadiclab.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 05:45:24PM +0200, Pekka Nikander wrote: > >Surely BEET will work also for AH with minor changes, even though we > >only tried the ESP encapsulation. > > I wouldn't be so sure. IIRC, tunnel mode is not specified for AH but > for ESP only. Consequently, defining BEET mode for AH might be Well plain tunnel mode certainly is specified for AH as well as IPComp. But you're right the semantics of BEET mode for AH needs to be thought out. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Add prefetches in net/ipv4/route.c, Rick Jones |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.12.2] XFRM: BEET IPsec mode for Linux, Diego Beltrami |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Infrahip] Re: [hipl-users] Re: [PATCH 2.6.12.2] XFRM: BEET IPsec mode for Linux, Pekka Nikander |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.12.2] XFRM: BEET IPsec mode for Linux, Diego Beltrami |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |