| To: | Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: Additional ethtool support |
| From: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Jul 2005 01:26:03 +0200 |
| Cc: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, renaud.lienhart@xxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <42D16656.6000207@colorfullife.com> |
| References: | <42D101EC.6000608@colorfullife.com> <20050710172833.GA1951@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <42D16656.6000207@colorfullife.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
Manfred Spraul <manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [memcpy_fromio] > Not for a nic without complete documentation: What if an arch uses > 64-bit reads to read two registers at the same time? So far, no citizen of arch/ does. Afaik it would probably be a bad idea on pci-x. > that, for example IIRC natsemi explicitely mandates 32-bit reads. > x86-64 doesn't, it uses 32-bit reads, but I don't like the idea of using > memcpy to read registers. Ok. -- Ueimor |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 78/82] remove linux/version.h from net/ieee80211/, Olaf Hering |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] loop unrolling in net/sched/sch_generic.c, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: Additional ethtool support, Manfred Spraul |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: Additional ethtool support, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |