| To: | Eric Dumazet <dada1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] loop unrolling in net/sched/sch_generic.c |
| From: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Jul 2005 03:02:00 +0200 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <42CB2B84.50702@cosmosbay.com> |
| References: | <20050705173411.GK16076@postel.suug.ch> <20050705.142210.14973612.davem@davemloft.net> <20050705213355.GM16076@postel.suug.ch> <20050705.143548.28788459.davem@davemloft.net> <42CB14B2.5090601@cosmosbay.com> <20050705234104.GR16076@postel.suug.ch> <42CB2698.2080904@cosmosbay.com> <42CB2B84.50702@cosmosbay.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
* Eric Dumazet <42CB2B84.50702@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-07-06 02:53 > (Sorry, still using 2.6.12, but the idea remains) I think you got me wrong, the whole point of this qdisc is to prioritize which means that we cannot dequeue from prio 1 as long as the queue in prio 0 is not empty. If you have no traffic at all for prio=0 and prio=1 then the best solution is to replace the qdisc on the device with a simple fifo. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] loop unrolling in net/sched/sch_generic.c, Eric Dumazet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] loop unrolling in net/sched/sch_generic.c, Eric Dumazet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] loop unrolling in net/sched/sch_generic.c, Eric Dumazet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] loop unrolling in net/sched/sch_generic.c, Eric Dumazet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |