| To: | ak@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:16:26 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, becker@xxxxxxxxx, rick.jones2@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050622211058.GY14251@wotan.suse.de> |
| References: | <20050622180654.GX14251@wotan.suse.de> <20050622.132241.21929037.davem@davemloft.net> <20050622211058.GY14251@wotan.suse.de> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 23:10:58 +0200 > 8 entries? That sounds very small. Is that an old Sparc or something? :) Hey, Sparc does suck, this isn't news for anyone :-) > Looks reasonable. Not sure about the "most optimal" though, some benchmarking > of different schemes would be probably a good idea. Absolutely. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch,rfc] allow registration of multiple netpolls per interface, Matt Mackall |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Chris Friesen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |