| To: | Willy Tarreau <willy@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] fix small DoS on connect() (was Re: BUG: Unusual TCP Connect() results.) |
| From: | Denis Vlasenko <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 12 Jun 2005 20:47:07 +0300 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xschmi00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, alastair@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050612173614.GA11157@alpha.home.local> |
| References: | <42A9C607.4030209@unixtrix.com> <200506122010.33075.vda@ilport.com.ua> <20050612173614.GA11157@alpha.home.local> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.5.4 |
On Sunday 12 June 2005 20:36, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 08:10:33PM +0300, Denis Vlasenko wrote: > > > Does it seem appropriate for mainline ? In this case, I would also > > > backport > > > it to 2.4 and send it to you for inclusion. > > > > It does not contain a comment why it is configurable. > > You're right. Better with this ? Very nice. BTW, is there any real world applications which ever used this? > + If you want backwards compatibility with every possible application, > + you should set it to 1. If you prefer to enhance security on your > + systems at the risk of breaking very rare specific applications, you'd > + better let it to 0. > + Default: 0 This text leaves an impression that they exist. -- vda |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] fix small DoS on connect() (was Re: BUG: Unusual TCP Connect() results.), Willy Tarreau |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] fix small DoS on connect() (was Re: BUG: Unusual TCP Connect() results.), Willy Tarreau |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] fix small DoS on connect() (was Re: BUG: Unusual TCP Connect() results.), Willy Tarreau |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] fix small DoS on connect() (was Re: BUG: Unusual TCP Connect() results.), Willy Tarreau |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |