| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 0/9]: TCP: The Road to Super TSO |
| From: | John Heffner <jheffner@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:40:10 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050606.210846.07641049.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Organization: | PSC |
| References: | <20050606.210846.07641049.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.8 |
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 12:08 am, David S. Miller wrote: > Some folks, notable the S2IO guys, get performance degradation > from the Super TSO v2 patch (they get it from the first version > as well). It's a real pain to spot what causes such things > in such a huge patch... so I started splitting things up in > a very fine grained manner so we can catch regressions more > precisely. I'm curious about the details of this. Is there decreased performance relative to current TSO? Relative to no TSO? Sending to just one receiver or many, and is it receiver limited? -John |
| Previous by Date: | Re: ipw2100: firmware problem, Pavel Machek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/1] sysctl configurable icmperror sourceaddress, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/9]: TCP: The Road to Super TSO, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/9]: TCP: The Road to Super TSO, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |