| To: | randy_dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.12-rcx networking oops |
| From: | Phil Oester <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:34:51 -0700 |
| Cc: | herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050606224646.24af30ff.rdunlap@xenotime.net> |
| References: | <20050531224012.GA16789@linuxace.com> <20050601054955.GA2625@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050601170058.GA20112@linuxace.com> <20050606224646.24af30ff.rdunlap@xenotime.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 10:46:46PM -0700, randy_dunlap wrote: > Agreed, the stack trace is suspicious. (more below) Yes, many of the oops i've collected are questionable... > This is with NAPI, right? Would it make sense to try it with that > disabled? (I don't recall you saying it's NAPI, but the e1000 > functions seem to indicate that.) It is NAPI, but it works fine up to 2.6.11-rc1. 2.6.11-rc2 fails, so I'm now testing each individual -bk snapshot between them in hopes of finding the offending changeset. Given that this box is a firewall, it could be the slew of large netfilter changes which went into -rc2, but we'll see. > and how about enabling CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER ? It is enabled. Phil |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 7/7] [PKT_SCHED]: noop/noqueue qdisc style cleanups, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Ronciak, John |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.12-rcx networking oops, randy_dunlap |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH][3/3] RapidIO support: net driver over messaging, Matt Porter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |