Re: [PATCH] ieee80211: Update generic definitions to latest specs.

[Jiri Benc <jbenc@xxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 21:02:24 +0200, gwingerde@xxxxxxx wrote:
> I was thinking about that too, but couldn't find a proper shorter
> version without losing the descriptive meaning.
> 
> Do you have any suggestions to shorten them?

Maybe we can lose a bit of descriptiveness and put comments above
definitions instead?

I can imagine names such as WLAN_STATUS_ASSOC_DENIED_NOSPECTRUM,
WLAN_STATUS_ASSOC_DENIED_BAD_POWER,
WLAN_STATUS_ASSOC_DENIED_BAD_SUPPCHANNS, WLAN_REASON_DISASSOC_BAD_POWER,
and so on. Also WLAN_STATUS_ASSOC_DENIED_NOSHORT seems to be acceptable
for me.

More often used identifiers probably could have even shorter name - what
about renaming IEEE80211_FCTL_PROTECTEDFRAME to
IEEE80211_FCTL_PROTECTED?

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Benc
SUSE Labs