| To: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 03 Jun 2005 13:31:33 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | mitch.a.williams@xxxxxxxxx, john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx, jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx, ganesh.venkatesan@xxxxxxxxx, jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1117828771.6071.77.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| References: | <20050603.120126.41874584.davem@davemloft.net> <Pine.CYG.4.58.0506031202280.3344@mawilli1-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com> <1117828771.6071.77.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 15:59:31 -0400 > But one that you could validate by putting proper hooks. As an example, > try to restore a descriptor every time you pick one - for an example of > this look at the sb1250 driver. Yes, this in my mind is exactly the problem. TG3 does this properly, as do several other drivers. You should never defer RX buffer replenishment, you should always do it as you grab packets off of the ring. You will starve the chip otherwise. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Ben Greear |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 0/2] ieee80211: Update generic definitions to latest specs - take #2, Gertjan van Wingerde |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch, Jon Mason |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |