Re: Bug in 2.6.11.11 - udp_poll(), fragments + CONFIG

netdev

Re: Bug in 2.6.11.11 - udp_poll(), fragments + CONFIG_HIGHMEM

To:	herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: Bug in 2.6.11.11 - udp_poll(), fragments + CONFIG_HIGHMEM
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 30 May 2005 15:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
Cc:	Steven.Hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<E1Dcs8Y-0006bl-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
References:	<E1DclTK-0002qE-00@mta1.cl.cam.ac.uk> <E1Dcs8Y-0006bl-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 07:49:30 +1000

> Thanks for catching this.  The receive queue lock is never taken
> in IRQs (and should never be) so we can simply substitute bh for
> irq.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied, thanks Herbert.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Bug in 2.6.11.11 - udp_poll(), fragments + CONFIG_HIGHMEM, Herbert Xu Re: Bug in 2.6.11.11 - udp_poll(), fragments + CONFIG_HIGHMEM, David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH 2.6] fix deadlock with ip_queue and tcp local input path, David S. Miller
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH 1/2] Resend: LSM-IPSec Networking Hooks, James Morris
Previous by Thread:	Re: Bug in 2.6.11.11 - udp_poll(), fragments + CONFIG_HIGHMEM, Herbert Xu
Next by Thread:	[TC PATCH] some fixes for ipt action, Pablo Neira
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]