| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting |
| From: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 28 May 2005 14:18:27 +0200 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1117244893.6251.41.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| References: | <20050527125010.GO15391@postel.suug.ch> <1117202331.6383.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050527141320.GQ15391@postel.suug.ch> <1117206091.6383.73.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050527151913.GA15391@postel.suug.ch> <1117209466.6383.106.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050527165935.GC15391@postel.suug.ch> <1117242749.6251.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050528012810.GN15391@postel.suug.ch> <1117244893.6251.41.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
* jamal <1117244893.6251.41.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-05-27 21:48 > I did check netfilter, net/sched/ tcp_diag, xfrm and they do things > right. OK. > Hrm - you should probably have said that in the patch text ;-> I wanted to have some time for testing today without the need to resubmit the patches. ;-> > I did test the one i sent - basic things and by code inspection saw > little risk as well. Perhaps we should push mine then you can add on top > of it. I just tested both patches for about 30 minutes. Everything OK. Feel free to apply the patches. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/4] [NEIGH] neighbour table configuration and statistics via rtnetlink, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] textsearch infrastructure et al v2, Thomas Graf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH: rtnetlink explicit flags setting, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |